TechCrunch Minute: Google's Gemini Code Assist wants to use AI to help developers | TechCrunch

TechCrunch Minute: Google's Gemini Code Assist wants to use AI to help developers | TechCrunch

Could AI eat the jobs of developers who are busy building AI models? The short answer is no, but the long answer is undecided. This week there is news that Google has a A new AI-powered coding tool for developers That means the competitive pressure between big tech companies to create the best service to help coders write more code is heating up even faster.

Microsoft's GitHub Copilot service has a similar outline. Constantly working to adapt the enterprise. Both companies eventually want to create developer-assistive tech that can understand the company's codebase, and allow it to offer more tailored suggestions and recommendations.

Startups are also in the fray, though they tend to focus on more niche solutions than the broader offerings from the biggest tech companies. Pythagoras, TuskAnd oval From the most recent Y Combinator Batches are working on building apps from user input, AI agents for bug squashing, and turning GitHub comments into code, respectively.

Everywhere you look, developers are creating tools and services to help their professionals.

Developers learning to code today wouldn't know a world without the help of AI-powered coding. Call it the era of the graphic calculator for software developers. But the danger – or worry, I suppose – is that over time the AI ​​tools that have been churning out mountains of code to help humans do more work will eventually be able to do just as much. Will know that less people are needed to do the work. Writing code for companies themselves. And if a company can spend less money and hire fewer people, it will. No job is safe, some roles are more difficult to change at any moment.

Thankfully, given the complexities of modern software services, the ever-present tech debt, and the countless edge cases that today's big tech and startups are busy building, it seems that coding is very useful and something like that. Which is not ready to change or reduce. The number of humans who built them. So far. I wouldn't take the other end of that bet on a time frame of several decades.

About the Author

Leave a Reply