Google dubs Epic's demands from its antitrust win 'unnecessary' and 'far beyond the scope' of the verdict | TechCrunch

Google dubs Epic's demands from its antitrust win 'unnecessary' and 'far beyond the scope' of the verdict | TechCrunch

In a new filing, Google is pushing back against several of Epic Games, the makers of Fortnite. Recommended treatment After a court determined that Google engaged in anti-competitive practices on its Play Store. Following The jury decided late last year, both sides argued their cases about how Google should change its behavior in light of the decision. For its part, Epic Games issued a wild laundry list of demands; This includes access to the Play Store catalog of app and game titles for six years, the ability to distribute your app store on Google Play at no charge, and more. It also wanted to end all contracts, incentives and deals, as well as penalties that allow the Play Store or Google Play billing to gain an upper hand over competitors.

Tech Dev is amazing and Defeat quickly was a landmark decision, especially since the Epic Games A similar antitrust case was largely lost. With Apple, that was not tried by the jury. In the Epic Apple case, the court ruled that Apple was not a monopolist, but agreed that developers should be able to direct their customers to alternative means of payment through the web. The case was appealed to the Supreme Court. who refused to listen to him.Allows the judgment of the lower court to be upheld.

While the jury in the Google case believed the tech giant had exploited its market power in illegal ways, it didn't get to decide what next steps to take — that was up to the judge. The new filing, along with Epic's proposal, will help inform Judge James Donato at a May 23 hearing on what steps to take next to rein in Google's power.

The Epic Games were in April. detailed His demands in the proposed decree Found here. At a high level, Epic wants Google to allow users to download apps from any app store or web they prefer. It doesn't want Google to be able to block or force OEMs or carriers to favor Google Play. And it doesn't want Google to be able to impose additional fees for routing around the Play Store, which Epic Games believes is also an anti-competitive practice.

The Fortnite maker also asked the court to implement other changes, including giving Epic access to the Play Store catalog so it can perform user app updates without warning screens or additional fees. In addition, Epic wants developers to be able to tell their customers how to pay for their apps and services elsewhere, and how much they can save by doing so. It wants to eliminate the need to use Google.User Choice BillingWhich offers only a small discount to developers processing self-payment transactions, and more.

Google, of course, disagrees with how the court should proceed.

In a statement, Google's vice president of government affairs and public policy, Wilson White, called Epic's demands excessive and unnecessary.

“Epic's demands will harm the privacy, security, and overall experience of users, developers, and device manufacturers,” he said. “Not only is their proposal far outside the scope of the recent U.S. lawsuit decision — which we will challenge — it's also unnecessary because of the settlements we reached last year with state attorneys general from every state and multiple territories. We will continue to vigorously defend our right to a sustainable business model that allows us to keep people safe, partner with developers to innovate and grow their businesses, and promote everyone. Pizer enables the Android ecosystem to sustain itself.”

In an injunction filed Thursday in U.S. District Court in California, Google argued that Epic's demands put users' security and privacy at risk because it requires them to enforce trust and security measures around the use of third-party app stores. will eliminate its capacity. (Apple has used a similar strategy to fight regulations about opening its App Store to competition, saying it is responsible for consumer privacy and security.)

In addition, Google says it must tell all third-party app stores what apps a user has installed without the user's consent. It would expose the use of personal apps, including those in sensitive areas such as religion, politics or health, without rules on how that data can be used.

The company also said that Epic is asking it to remove security measures around sideloading apps.

And if those arguments fail, in another tactic, Google points out that Epic's proposed remedy isn't necessary because it has already settled with state attorneys general that it can now deal with developers broadly. will not sign discriminatory agreements. Epic's proposal would also prevent Google from working with developers to deliver exclusive content through Play Store apps, which it says is a significant opportunity for developers.

Ultimately, the State AG settlement will allow any app store to compete for placement on Android devices, Google said, but Epic's proposal would cut it out of the process, reducing competition. Without Google's involvement, rival app stores would bid lower, affecting OEM margins.

The judge's upcoming decision on the remedy in this case will be an interesting one to watch because it will set the stage for how app stores will have to make concessions to allow more competition from those deemed to be monopolists. . Although Epic lost its battle with Apple, the Justice Department's lawsuit against the iPhone maker is still ongoing, as is its lawsuit with Google over its alleged search monopoly. The outcome of these cases will determine how unbridled the power of the tech giants will be, given the apparent lack of legislation in the US to reign in technology monopolies.

About the Author

Leave a Reply